A while back, when a Danish newspaper published the infamous "Mohammed cartoons" (I think it was before "Telling Stories" came into being), I commented in a few blogs that Muslims had a right to be offended and to demand an apology since there appeared to be no useful purpose to publishing the cartoons other than to prove that the newspaper could publish it. I also said that the non-violent protests and the Danish boycott were also "free speech" that should not be criticized, but rather, embraced and discussed by the Western world.
Then came the Pope's speech and, as I noted here, the speech wasn't about Islam at all, but rather about faith and reason. Moreover, the Catholic Church's position no longer holds the views expressed by Byzantine emperor Manuel II Paleologus in that excerpt. As noted in that letter,
The Catholic Church rejects nothing that is true and holy in these
religions. She regards with sincere reverence those ways of conduct
and of life, those precepts and teachings which, though differing in
many aspects from the ones she holds and sets forth, nonetheless often
reflect a ray of that Truth which enlightens all men. Indeed, she
proclaims, and ever must proclaim Christ, "the way the truth, and the
life" (John 14, 6), in whom men may find the fullness of religious
life, in whom God has reconciled all things to Himself.
The Church therefore, exhorts her sons, that through dialogue and
collaboration with the followers of other religions, carried out with
prudence and love and in witness to the Christian faith and life,
they recognize, preserve and promote the good things, spiritual and
moral, as well as the socio-cultural values found among these men.
The Church regards with esteem also the Moslems. They adore the
one God, living and subsisting in Himself, merciful and all-powerful,
the Creator of heaven and earth, who has spoken to men; they take
pains to submit wholeheartedly to even His inscrutable decrees, just as
Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes great pleasure in linking
itself, submitted to God. Though they do not acknowledge Jesus as
God, they revere Him as a prophet. They also honor Mary, His virgin
mother; at times they even call on her with devotion. In addition,
they await the day of judgement when God will render their deserts to
all those who have been raised up from the dead. Finally, they value
the moral life and worship God especially through prayer, almsgiving
and fasting.
Emphasis added. Why the Pope didn't make reference to this document is beyond me.
But now, at the other extreme, comes news that a German Opera company canceled a production that included a depiction of Mohammed's severed head because of security concerns
Officials with the world-renowned Deutsche Oper decided late Monday that the show -- an avant-garde remake of Mozart's "Idomeneo" -- could not go on after police warned that it could result in a violent backlash from Muslim fundamentalists. Opera officials said they were worried about a repeat of the worldwide protests that erupted this year after a Danish newspaper published cartoons satirizing Muhammad.
The show premiered at the Deutsche Oper in March 2003 and drew some jeers -- but no violence -- for a scene in which Idomeneo, the king of Crete, balks at making sacrifices to the gods and instead produces the severed heads of Muhammad, Jesus, Buddha and Poseidon, god of the sea.
Set in ancient Greece, the opera is considered a forceful critique of theological dogma and wars conducted in the name of religion. Neuenfels's three-act, Italian-language production was last at the Deutsche Oper in 2004.
Emphasis added. As the NY Times noted,
The severed heads of the religious figures, Mr. Raue said, was meant by Mr. Neuenfels to make a point that “all the founders of religions were figures that didn’t bring peace to the world.”
In this case, this is not criticism directed at Islam, but rather at religion. Not at "a" religion, but at the concept or what a religion is or isn't.
It's one thing to insult a group - religious, ethnic, or other - for no reason. It's quite another to condemn someone like the Pope who, although insensitive, was not attacking a group per se. However, what are Westerners supposed to do? Shut up? Not say anything about Islam or Muslims?
Some actually believe that's the "solution:"
Non-Muslims should practise selfcensorship to avoid triggering violent reactions, a prominent Perth Muslim says. Perth academic Samina Yasmeen said religious and community leaders should stop speaking about Islamic icons to avoid causing offence.
Emphasis added. And why does professor Yasmeen thinks so?
Associate Professor Yasmeen, director of the University of WA’s centre for Muslim states and societies, accused the Pope of deliberately provoking the aggression by inviting criticism of Mohammed.
She said the Pope and other religious leaders had the same responsibility as Islamic clerics to avoid encouraging violence by followers.
Previous emotive reactions, such as the violence following the publication of cartoons depicting Mohammed and Salman Rushdie’s 1988 novel The Satanic Verses, should have warned people not to criticise Islam. Professor Yasmeen denied that the first reaction of many Muslims to perceived insults was violence, despite calls by some clerics to kill those who insult Islam and the murder of an Italian nun in Somalia. “I am not supportive of people killing and blowing things up, but people need to start looking at selfcensorship,” she said.
Emphasis added. Now, citing a quote from a text to make a point that has nothing to do with Islam is "inviting criticism of Mohammed." And "inviting criticism of Mohammed" is enough to cause an extreme backlash against the Pope.
Anyone who has read this blog knows I'm neither conservative -yeeeeeck- nor nativist. In fact, I've always said that I'm a believer in live and let live. So, I look at Professor Yasmeen's comments and I can only say one thing.
YOU'VE GOT TO BE F***ING KIDDING ME! Self-censorship? In my own country? THAT is not happening. If I went to a predominantly Muslim country, I would follow local custom because it's the respectful thing to do. You don't go to someone else's house and tell them what they can or cannot do.
We live in an open society where free speech is a vehicle to explore ideas, debate differences, and increase knowledge. With free speech comes the responsibility to own up to the consequences of that speech. That's the way it is here.
This reaction reminds me of all those old sodomy laws, which are still in the books in some states, barring certain sexual acts even when they occur in the intimacy of a person's home. Those acts were forbidden because just the thought of two consenting adults engaging in those acts was deemed to be offensive. Or the reaction of so-called family groups concerned about sex and/or violence on TV.
What Muslims who live in the Western world need to understand is that here, "Let Live" is just as important as "Live."
And I wouldn't want it any other way.
Tags: Current Affairs, Free Speech, Music, Religion, Politics